Returns to the Greeks: Conceptual Crisis, Interpretive Strategies, and the Role of the Ancient Greeks in Modern Physics

Alberto Bardi

Abstract


This paper explores how modern physicists—Schrödinger, Heisenberg, and Rovelli—draw on Greek philosophy in different ways. For Schrödinger and Heisenberg, Greek ideas offer conceptual tools to address quantum theory’s challenges, with Schrödinger favoring pre-Socratic realism and continuity, while Heisenberg emphasizes Platonic and Aristotelian notions of potentiality and epistemic limits. Rovelli uses Aristotle to support scientific cumulativity, arguing older theories remain relevant within new frameworks. However, this conflates the recoverability of previous theories with historical continuity. The shift from Aristotelian to Newtonian physics represents a fundamental change in what counts as explanation, so references to the Greeks do not inherently guarantee cumulative knowledge; their impact depends on how Greek concepts are interpreted.

Keywords


Science cumulativity; Ancient Greek philosophy; Quantum Physics; Erwin Schrödinger; Werner Heisenberg; Carlo Rovelli

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2006. Thinking with Objects: The Transformation of Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Crowther, Karen. 2020. “What Is the Point of Reduction in Science?” Erkenntnis 85 (6): 1437–1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0085-6.

Dear, Peter. 1995. Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Fernández Mouján, Raimundo. 2024. “Greek Philosophy for Quantum Physics: The Return to the Greeks in the Works of Heisenberg, Pauli and Schrödinger.” In Probing the Meaning of Quantum Mechanics: Probability, Metaphysics, Explanation and Measurement, edited by Diederik Aerts, Jonas R. B. Arenhart, Christian de Ronde, and Giuseppe Sergioli, 101–137. New Jersey: World Scientific.

Heisenberg, Werner. 1958. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Koyré, Alexandre. 1968. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Machamer, Peter, ed. 1998. The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norton, John D. 2012. “Approximation and Idealization: Why the Difference Matters.” Philosophy of Science 79 (2): 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1086/664746.

Palacios, Patricia. 2024. “Intertheory Relations in Physics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. First published January 18, 2024.

Rovelli, Carlo. 2024. “Scientific Thinking across the Centuries and the Foundations of Physics.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2877 (1): 012084. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2877/1/012084.

Schrödinger, Erwin. 1951. Science and Humanism: Physics in Our Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schrödinger, Erwin. 1954. Nature and the Greeks. Cambridge: University Press.

Verelst, Karin, and Bob Coecke. 2006. “Early Greek Thought and Perspectives for the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Preliminaries to an Ontological Approach.” arXiv preprint arXiv:physics/0611064.

Wallace, William A. 1992. Galileo’s Logic of Discovery and Proof: The Background, Content, and Use of His Appropriated Treatises on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8040-3




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23756/sp.v14i1.1739

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Alberto Bardi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Science & Philosophy - Journal of Epistemology, Science and Philosophy. ISSN 2282-7757; eISSN  2282-7765.