A Multi-Criteria Analysis for the Evaluation of Social Housing Proposals: from the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to the Analytic Network Process (ANP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23756/sp.v4i2.288Keywords:
multicriteria decision making, sustainable social housing, problem structuring methodsAbstract
Social housing requires appropriate evaluation models of projects, considering them from multiple perspectives: architectural, technical, environmental, economic, financial, paying particular attention to social aspects. The study proposes the use of a multi criteria evaluation model, based on the hierarchical (AHP) and network (ANP) analysis, as support in decision-making to guide practitioners and policy on the choice among alternative interventions. These methods allow to consider the overall effect of projects on urban system and the different points of view of those concerned, in an integrated and participatory approach. Interesting research perspectives concern the application of these evaluation approaches to case studies related to neighborhoods in which urban planning provides for social housing. The analysis will address the recent proposals for social housing in the city of Pescara (Italy), and in particular the urban transformation that is expected to achieve by means of the Integrated Urban Development Programme on the south-west of the city, whose regeneration was started by the Community Programme Urban 2.
Un’Analisi Multi Criteri per la Valutazione delle Proposte di Housing Sociale: dall’Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) all’Analytic Network Process (ANP)
I modelli insediativi di social housing richiedono idonei strumenti valutativi degli interventi immobiliari, considerandoli da molteplici punti di vista: architettonici, urbanistici, ambientali, economici, finanziari, con particolare attenzione agli aspetti sociali. Lo studio propone l’impiego di un modello valutativo multicriteri basato sull’analisi gerarchica (AHP) e a rete (ANP), come supporto ai processi decisionali riguardanti la scelta tra interventi alternativi di edilizia residenziale sociale, considerando il loro effetto complessivo sul sistema urbano secondo un approccio integrato e partecipativo.
Parole Chiave: analisi multicriteri, edilizia residenziale sociale sostenibile, strutturazione del problema decisionale
Downloads
References
Agenzia del Demanio (2015). Obiettivi, progetti e prospettive sul patrimonio immobiliare pubblico per far crescere l’Italia (http://www.agenziademanio.it)
Bottero, M.; Lami, I.M. and Lombardi, P. (2008). Analytic Network Process. La valutazione di scenari di trasformazione urbana e territoriale. Firenze: Alinea Editrice
Cecchini, A. Plaisant, A (2005). Analisi e modelli per la pianificazione: teoria e pratica: lo stato dell'arte. Franco Angeli
Cecodhas Housing Europe (2012). The Housing Europe Review 2012
Cecodhas Housing Europe (2015). The State of Housing in the EU 2015
Comitato Interministeriale per le Politiche Urbane (2013). Metodi e contenuti sulle Priorità in tema di Agenda Urbana
(http://www.programmazioneeconomica.gov.it/2016/06/16/politiche-urbane/)
ISPRA Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (2014). L’ambiente urbano: conoscere e valutare la complessità
(http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/it/pubblicazioni/)
Ministero per la Coesione territoriale (2012). Metodi e obiettivi per un uso efficace dei fondi comunitari 2014-2020 (http://www.dps.tesoro.it/view.asp)
Ronzoni, M.R.; Roda, R. and Monti, C. (2002). Costruire sostenibile: l’Europa. Firenze: Alinea Ed.
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill
Saaty, T.L. and Kearns, K.P. (1985). Analytica Planning. Pittsburg: RWS Publications
Saaty, T.L. (1994). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, Interfaces, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp.19–43.
Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G. (1991). The Logic of Priorities. Pittsburg: RWS Publications
Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G. (2000). Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Saaty, R.W. (2003). Decision making in complex environments, Tutorial Superdecisions
Saaty, T.L. & Cillo B., (2008). The Encyclicon. Vol.2. A dictionary of complex decisions using the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The journal is committed to real and immediate open access for academic work. All of the journal articles are free to access immediately from the date of publication. There are no charge for readers to download articles and reviews for their own scholarly use. Benefits of open access for authors, include:
- Free access for all users worldwide
- Increased visibility and readership
- Rapid publication
- No spatial constraints
- Authors can share their research papers on their personal web-pages (i.e. ResearchGate, etc.)
Copyright and Licensing Terms
SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY publishes open access articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open-access article, as long as the author is properly attributed. Copyright on any research article published by SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY is retained by the author(s). Authors grant SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
For further information visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. The following logo will appear in any paper that will be published from the volume number 31/2016 onwards:
