Positivist and Interpretivist Ideas of Anol Bhattacherjee on The Methods of Data Collection: A Textual Critique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23756/sp.v12i1.1589Keywords:
Positivism, interpretivism, quantitative research, qualitative research, data collection methodsAbstract
In the literature, the distinction between positivism and interpretivism based on ontological assumptions is somehow clear. Problems in dividing them based on epistemological assumptions continue to exist and appear in several works; for instance, Bhattacherjee’s book (2012) introduced the concept of research design and categorization of methods of data collection based on positivist and interpretivist epistemological assumptions. While acknowledging Bhattacherjee's contribution, nonetheless, the paper argues that since both the quantitative and qualitative research approaches share a few epistemological assumptions, strictly categorizing them into positivism and interpretivism raises some confusion. Consequently, impacting communication among researchers and the implementation of the research projects. Therefore, the paper describes Bhattacherjee's contributions and limitations in understanding the dichotomy existing between positivist and interpretivist methods of data collection. The paper's suggestions aim to resolve such confusion and restore research approaches and their methods of data collection to their original philosophical positions. Thus minimizing the existing confusion on research methodology in the current literature.
Downloads
References
Anderson, J. A. (2011). Media Research Methods Understanding Metric and Interpretive Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices (2nd ed.). Textbooks collection. 3. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3
Cowie, N. (2009). Observation. In: Heigham, J., Croker, R.A. (eds.) Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239517_8
Crawford, L. (1987). Intercultural Communication Study: A description of an Interpretive/Ethnographic Approach. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED281262
Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among five approaches. London: SAGE Publications.
Daniel, B. (2018). Empirical verification of the "TACT" framework for teaching rigour in qualitative research methodology. Qualitative Research Journal, 18 (3), 262-275. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-17-00012
Deepty, S. (2021). In Search of Paradigmatic Diversification in Academic Finance. Journal of Business Studies, 52 (1), 59-71.
Hart, T. (2017). Online Ethnography. In J. Matthes (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0172
Lubet, S. (2018). Interrogating Ethnography. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ntseno, C. (2022). Higher Education Policies and Institutional Theological Education Needs: A practical Theological Exploration with Specific References to Private Theological Institutions in South Africa. PhD Thesis submitted to the University of South Africa. https://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/29216/theis_ntseno_cj.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Page, S., & Connell, J. (Eds.). (2012). The Routledge Handbook of Events. USA: Routledge.
Peng, P., Zhao, W., Deng, X., Guo, B., & Wu, W. (2023). Research on Evaluation of Construction Workers' Job Satisfaction Based on Improved AHP-FCE Method. In: Li, J., Lu, W., Peng, Y., Yuan, H., Wang, D. (eds) Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. CRIOCM 2022. Lecture Notes in Operations Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3626-7_70
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students. (5thEdn). Rome. Prentice Hill.
Shesterinina, A. (2021). Sources of evidence and openness in field intensive research on violent conflict. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 9 (4), 851-857, DOI: 10.1080/21565503.2021.1950015
Tshabangu, I., Ba, S., & Madondo, S. (2020). Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research. A volume in the Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management (AKATM) Book Series. IGI Global. Publisher of Timely Knowledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The journal is committed to real and immediate open access for academic work. All of the journal articles are free to access immediately from the date of publication. There are no charge for readers to download articles and reviews for their own scholarly use. Benefits of open access for authors, include:
- Free access for all users worldwide
- Increased visibility and readership
- Rapid publication
- No spatial constraints
- Authors can share their research papers on their personal web-pages (i.e. ResearchGate, etc.)
Copyright and Licensing Terms
SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY publishes open access articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open-access article, as long as the author is properly attributed. Copyright on any research article published by SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY is retained by the author(s). Authors grant SCIENCE & PHILOSOPHY a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
For further information visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. The following logo will appear in any paper that will be published from the volume number 31/2016 onwards:
