A simple goodness-of-fit test for continuous conditional distributions

Authors

  • Peter J. Veazie University of Rochester Department of Public Health Sciences 265 Crittenden Blvd. CU 420644 Rochester, New York 14642-0644
  • Zhiqiu Ye University of Rochester Department of Public Health Sciences 265 Crittenden Blvd. CU 420644 Rochester, New York 14642-0644

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23755/rm.v39i0.524

Keywords:

Goodness-of-fit test, model specification test, conditional continuous distributions

Abstract

This paper presents a pragmatic specification test for conditional continuous distributions with uncensored data.  We employ Monte Carlo (MC) experiments and the 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data to examine coverage and power to discern deviations from correct model specification in distribution and parameterization. We carry out MC experiments using 2000 runs for sample sizes 500 and 1000. The experiments show that the test has accurate coverage under correct specification, and that the test can discern deviations from correct specification in both the distributional family and parameterization. The power increases as sample size increases. The empirical example shows the test’s ability to identify specific distributions from other candidates using real cost data. Although the test can be used as a goodness-of-fit test for marginal distributions, it is particularly useful as an easy-to-use test for conditional continuous distributions, even those with one observation per pattern of explanatory variables.

References

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey [Online]. Available: http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats/MEPS_topics.jsp [Accessed February 14 2016].

AMEMIYA, T. 1985. Advanced Econometrics, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

ANDREWS, D. W. K. 1997. A Conditional Kolmogorov Test. Econometrica, 65, 1097-1128.

COHEN, J. W., COHEN, S. B. & BANTHIN, J. S. 2009. The medical expenditure panel survey: a national information resource to support healthcare cost research and inform policy and practice. Med. Care., 47, S44-50.

DAVISON, A. C., HINKLEY, D. V. & YOUNG, G. A. 2003. Recent developments in bootstrap methodology. Statistical Science, 18, 141-157.

FAN, Y. Q., LI, Q. & MIN, I. 2006. A Nonparametric bootstrap test of conditional distributions. Economet. Theor., 22, 587-613.

FENTON, J. J., JERANT, A. F., BERTAKIS, K. D. & FRANKS, P. 2012. The cost of satisfaction: a national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Arch. Intern. Med., 172, 405-11.

FLEISHMAN, J. A. & COHEN, J. W. 2010. Using Information on Clinical Conditions to Predict High-Cost Patients. Health. Serv. Res., 45, 532-552.

HOSMER, D. W. & LEMESHOW, S. 1980. A goodness-of-fit test for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics Part A-Theory and Methods, 10, 1043-1069.

MOSCHOPOULOS, P. G. 1985. The distribution of the sum of independent gamma random variables. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 37, 541-544.

O'REILLY, F. J. & QUESENBERRY, C. P. 1973. The Conditional Probability Integral Transformation and Applications to Obtain Composite Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Tests. Ann. Statist., 1, 74-83.

O'REILLY, F. J. & STEPHENS, M. A. 1982. Characterizations and Goodness of Fit Tests. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 44, 353-360.

PREGIBON, D. 1980. Goodness of Link Tests for Generalized Linear Models. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. C, 29, 15-24.

RINCON-GALLARDO, S., QUESENBERRY, C. P. & O'REILLY, F. J. 1979. Conditional Probability Integral Transformations and Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Multivariate Normal Distributions. Ann. Statist., 7, 1052-1057.

ROTHSCHILD, V. & LOGOTHETIS, N. 1986. Probability distributions, Wiley.

SCHERVISH, M. J. 1995. Theory of Statistics, New York, Springer-Verlag.

ZHENG, J. X. 2000. A consistent test of conditional parametric distributions Economet. Theor., 16, 667-691.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

Issue

Vol. 39 (2020)

Section

Volume 39-2020

License

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The journal is committed to real and immediate open access for academic work. All of the journal articles are free to access immediately from the date of publication. There are no charge for readers to download articles and reviews for their own scholarly use. Benefits of open access for authors, include:

  • Free access for all users worldwide
  • Increased visibility and readership
  • Rapid publication
  • No spatial constraints
  • Authors can share their research papers on their personal web-pages (i.e. ResearchGate, etc.)

Ratio Mathematica publishes open access articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed. Copyright on any research article published by Ratio Mathematica is retained by the author(s). Authors grant Ratio Mathematica a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified. 
For further information visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. The following logo will appear in any paper that will be published from the volume number 31/2016 onwards.