Influence of information on behavioral effects in decision processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23755/rm.v28i1.26Keywords:
Behavioral Operational Research, Intertemporal Choice, Information in Decision ProcessesAbstract
Rational models in decision processes are marked out by many anomalies, caused by behavioral issues. We point out the importance of information in causing inconsistent preferences in a decision process. In a single or multi agent decision process each mental model is influenced by the presence, the absence or false information about the problem or about other members of the decision making group. The difficulty in modeling these effects increases because behavioral biases influence also the modeler. Behavioral Operational Research (BOR) studies these influences to create efficient models to define choices in similar decision processes.References
A. Bechara, H. Damasio, D. Tranel and A. R. Damasio, Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy, Science 275, (1997),1293-1295.
A. Bechara, The role of emotion in decision-making: evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage, Brain and Cognition 55, (2004), 30-40.
A. R. Damasio, Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain, Grosset/Putnam, New York, 1994.
D. Engelmann and M. Strobel, The False consensus effect: deconstruction and reconstruction of an anomaly, CERGE-EI Working Paper 233, (2004).
R. P. Hamalainen, J. Luoma and E. Saarinen, On the importance of behaviiral operational research: The case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems, European Journal of Operational Research 228, (2013), 623-634.
R. P. Hamalainen, Behavioral issues in environmental modeling - The missing perspective, Environmental Modelling and Software 73, (2015), 244-253.
A. Longo, M. Squillante, A. G. S. Ventre and V. Ventre, The intertemporal choice behaviour - The role of emotions in a multi-agent decision problem, Atti Accad. Pelorit. Pericol. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat., 93 (2), C* (2015) [14pages].
M. C. Nussbaum, Upheavals of thought. The intelligence of emotions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
B. Shiv, G. Loewenstein, A. Bechara, H. Damasio and A. R. Damasio, Investment behavior and the negative side of emotion, Psychological Science 16, (2005), 435-439.
M. Squillante and V. Ventre, Assessing false consensus effect in a consensus enhancing procedure, International Journal of Intelligent System 25, (2010), 274-285.
R. H. Strotz, Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utililty Maximization, Review of Economic Studies 23(3), (1955-1956), 165-80.
R. Thaler and H. M. Shefrin, An economic theory of self-control, Journal of Political Economy 89(2), (1981), 392-406.
A. G. S. Ventre and V. Ventre, The intertemporal choice behavior: classical and alternative delay discounting models and control techniques, Atti Accad. Pelorit. Pericol. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat. 90 (1), C3, (2012) [21 pages].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The journal is committed to real and immediate open access for academic work. All of the journal articles are free to access immediately from the date of publication. There are no charge for readers to download articles and reviews for their own scholarly use. Benefits of open access for authors, include:
- Free access for all users worldwide
- Increased visibility and readership
- Rapid publication
- No spatial constraints
- Authors can share their research papers on their personal web-pages (i.e. ResearchGate, etc.)
Ratio Mathematica publishes open access articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed. Copyright on any research article published by Ratio Mathematica is retained by the author(s). Authors grant Ratio Mathematica a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
For further information visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. The following logo will appear in any paper that will be published from the volume number 31/2016 onwards.