ARMA and/or SETAR Estimation and Out-of-Sample Forecast of the Mean-Reversion Between Brent Crude Oil and Gasoline Prices on the Ghanaian Market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23755/rm.v51i0.1581Keywords:
Mean-reversion, Ex-pump, Ex-refineryAbstract
The study investigates the existence of long-run equilibrium or mean-reversion using bivariate analysis of paired prices, as well as to test for linear and nonlinear threshold-type mean-reversion of bivariate relationships. The coefficient parameters of (non)linear VECM and threshold parameter value are estimated, and the forecast performance accuracies of the SETAR are compared to linear models of the mean-reversion process.
The two-regime SETAR model gives a much better prediction of cointegration relation than linear AR model. In the test for the two-regime SETAR model for the cointegration relation against a three-regime model, the two-regime model cannot be rejected at any reasonable significance level. The 2-SETAR exhibits significant constant and trending intervention features of the price build-up process. The asymmetric behavior remained the dominant feature of our mean reversion, which was also apparent. Although the MAPE is somewhat higher than the AR and ARMA processes, the threshold models outperformed the AR and ARMA processes. In summary, the mean reversion property is heavily reliant on the events that occurred in the preceding four bi-weekly pricing-periods in the swift unusual directions. In contrast, in the slow usual direction, it relies on the occurrence of the same in the only bi-weekly pricing-periods immediately preceding it.
References
Sticky prices, inventories, and market power in wholesale gasoline markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 33:116–139, 2002.
Rockets and feathers revisited: an international comparison on european gasoline market. Energy Economics, 25:175–90, 2002.
J. Bachmeier, L.J. & Griffin. New evidence on asymmetric gasoline price responses. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85:772–776, 2003.
R. Bacon. Rockets and feathers: the asymmetric speed of adjustment of uk retail gasoline prices to cost changes. Energy economics, 13:211–218, , 1991.
S. . Y. M. Balke, N.S.; Brown. Crude oil and gasoline prices: an asymmetric relationship. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review, pages 2–11, 1998.
T. Balke, N.S. & Fomby. Threshold cointegratio. International economic review, pages 627–645, 1997.
A. . G. R. Borenstein, S.; Cameron. Do gasoline prices respond asymmetrically o crude oil price changes? National Bureau of Economic Research, 1997.
G. E. P. Box and G. M. Jenkins. Time series analysis, forecasting and control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Clifs, 1994.
S. P. Brown and M. K. Yucel. Gasoline and crude oil prices: why the asymmetry? Economic and financial review, page 23, 2000.
M. Caner and B. E. Hansen. Threshold autoregression with a unit root. Econometrica, 69(6):1555–1596, 2001.
A. Di Narzo. Nonlinear autoregressive time series models in r using tsdyn version 0.7. 2008.
W. Dickey, D.A. & Fuller. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American statistical association, 74:427–431, 1979.
C. Enders, W. & Granger. Unit-root tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 16:304–311, 1998.
P. Enders, W. & Siklos. Cointegration and threshold adjustment. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19:166–176, 2001.
C. Engle, R.F. & Granger. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, pages 251–276, 1987.
J. Gonzalo, J. & Pitarakis. Threshold effects in cointegrating relationships. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 68:813–833, 2006.
B. Gregory, A.W. & Hansen. Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. Journal of econometrics, 70:99–126, 1996.
B. Hansen. Testing for linearity. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13, 1999.
B. E. Hansen. Inference in tar models. Studies in nonlinear dynamics & econometrics, 2(1), 1997.
B. E. Hansen and B. Seo. Testing for two-regime threshold cointegration in vector error-correction models. Journal of econometrics, 110(2):293–318, 2002.
H. Hansen and S. Johansen. Some tests for parameter constancy in cointegrated var-models. The Econometrics Journal, 2(2):306–333, 1999.
P. R. Hansen. A test for superior predictive ability. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 23(4):365–380, 2005.
B. N. Huang, C. W. Yang, and M. J. Hwang. The dynamics of a nonlinear relationship between crude oil spot and futures prices: A multivariate threshold regression approach. Energy Economics, 31 31:91 to 98, 2009.
S. Johansen. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of economic dynamics and control, 12(2-3):231–254, 1988.
S. Johansen. Identifying restrictions of linear equations with applications to simultaneous equations and cointegration. Journal of econometrics, 69(1):111–132,1995.
S. Johansen and K. Juselius. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 52(2):169–210, 1990.
J. D. Karrenbrock et al. The behavior of retail gasoline prices: symmetric or not? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 73(4):19–29, 1991.
D. Kwiatkowski, P. C. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y. Shin. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of econometrics, 54(1-3): 159–178, 1992.
B. Larsen. A threshold cointegration analysis of norwegian interest rates. Master’s thesis, Universitetet i Tromsø, 2012.
J. Meyer and S. von Cramon-Taubadel. Asymmetric price transmission: a survey. Journal of agricultural economics, 55(3):581–611, 2004.
V. Natanelov, M. J. Alam, A. M. McKenzie, and G. V. Huylenbroeck. Is there co-movement of agricultural commodities futures prices and crude oil? Energy Policy, 39:4971 to 4984, 2011.
S. Peltzman. Prices rise faster than they fall. Journal of Political Economy, 108:466–502., 2000.
P. C. Phillips and S. Ouliaris. Testing for cointegration using principal components methods. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2):205 – 230, 1988.
M. Seo. Bootstrap testing for the null of no cointegration in a threshold vector error correction model. Journal of Econometrics, 134(1):129–150, 2006.
D. Shin. Do product prices respond symmetrically to changes in crude oil prices? OPEC Review, 18:137–157, 1992.
J. H. Stock and M. W. Watson. Testing for common trends. Journal of the American statistical Association, 83(404):1097–1107, 1988.
M. Tappata. Rockets and feathers: Understanding asymmetric pricing. The RAND Journal of Economics, 40(4):673–687, 2009.
H. Tong. Threshold models in non-linear time series analysis. Lecture notes in statistics, No. 21. Springer-Verlag, 1983.
H. Tong and K. S. Lim. Threshold autoregression, limit cycles and cyclical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 42(3):245–268, 1980.
R. S. Tsay. Testing and modeling multivariate threshold models. journal of the american statistical association, 93(443):1188–1202, 1998.
H.-M. Zhu, S.-F. Li, and K. Yu. Crude oil shocks and stock markets: A panel threshold cointegration approach. Energy Economics, 33(5):987–994, 2011
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The journal is committed to real and immediate open access for academic work. All of the journal articles are free to access immediately from the date of publication. There are no charge for readers to download articles and reviews for their own scholarly use. Benefits of open access for authors, include:
- Free access for all users worldwide
- Increased visibility and readership
- Rapid publication
- No spatial constraints
- Authors can share their research papers on their personal web-pages (i.e. ResearchGate, etc.)
Ratio Mathematica publishes open access articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License. The Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article, adapt the article and make commercial use of the article. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open access article, as long as the author is properly attributed. Copyright on any research article published by Ratio Mathematica is retained by the author(s). Authors grant Ratio Mathematica a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
For further information visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. The following logo will appear in any paper that will be published from the volume number 31/2016 onwards.